Radiometric dating according to creationists wat beste datingsites

posted by | Leave a comment

No, never; and I dare say neither would those same scientists because they know the limitations of the science.

They know that radiometric dating is not, and in fact cannot be the precise science they want you to believe it is.

So if you in fact weigh 175 lbs, you would not expect one method to give you 50 lbs, another to give 250 and yet another to give you 388 lbs.

If that is the case, it is indicative of a serious problem with the techniques you are using to get the weight.

For example check the variance in ages from samples tested by two different methods.

[2] Variances were seen regardless of location: The expectation is that rocks located at the same site would date to the same age regardless of the method used.

From the data above, obviously that is not the case.

Christians can be divided into two groups when it comes to this.

The Radiometric Dating Method Once again let me point out that scientists regularly reject data from radiometric “dating” results.

One expert admitted: Or consider the statement of an evolutionist who didn’t agree with the radiometric dating (using five different radiometric techniques) of Australia’s “Mungo Man”, thinking it placed humans in Australia too early.

Additionally they know that different methods of dating are providing different ages. So within a narrow tolerance of a few ounces or perhaps a pound or two, a spring scale should provide the same weight as a balance scale (like what you might see in physicians’ offices), which should provide the same result as an electronic scale.

That there are different methods of determining weight is irrelevant to the fact that your weight is a single number, not a different number based on the method used.

Leave a Reply

direct love dating communities 2016 in usa