Radiometric dating laboratory
Other creationists have focused on instances in which radiometric dating seems to yield incorrect results.
In most instances, these efforts are flawed because the authors have misunderstood or misrepresented the data they attempt to analyze (for example, Woodmorappe 1979; Morris HM 1985; Morris JD 1994).
Perhaps the most widely used evidence for the theory of evolution through natural selection is the fossil record.
The fossil record may be incomplete and may never fully completed, but there are still many clues to evolution and how it happens within the fossil record.
Below is a chart of commonly used radiometric isotopes, their half-lives, and the daughter isotopes they decay into.
Let's say you found a fossil you think to be a human skeleton.
It will probably fail, but what would a reasonable person conclude from that? All they indicate is that the methods are not infallible.
Also called absolute dating, scientists use the decay of radioactive elements within the fossils or the rocks around the fossils to determine the age of the organism that was preserved.Now it is time to put those math skills to good use.At one half-life, you would have approximately 50% Carbon-14 and 50% Nitrogen-14.Even things that work well do not work well all of the time and under all circumstances.Try, for example, wearing a watch that is not waterproof while swimming. A few verified examples of incorrect radiometric ages are simply insufficient to prove that radiometric dating is invalid.